Education Issues Critical In Deciding If State Will Take Over L.A. County Juvenile Halls, Advocates Argue

Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox.Sign up for The 74 Newsletter

Get و stories و like – تفاصيل مهمة

For four consecutive days last month, a group of Los Angeles County students was suspended after a fight broke out in their classroom inside a juvenile detention facility.

This is according to Stacy Nuñez, an education attorney representing one of the students, who said her client was among those suspended and questions why he was penalized before the facility called a meeting to discuss other behavioral interventions.

The Los Angeles County Office of Education can interrupt education services, even those legally required under an Individualized Education Program, if there is “an immediate threat to the safety of youth or others,” according to a 2021 settlement with then-Attorney General Xavier Becerra. A second settlement with Los Angeles County, including its Probation Department, Department of Mental Health, and Department of Health Services, was also entered at the time.

But exactly how an “immediate threat” is defined is unclear and appears to be “completely discretionary,” Nuñez said.

to و of و is – تفاصيل مهمة

This lack of clarity on the legal settlement with the county education department, often referred to as LACOE, is just one of the reasons advocates say education access for detained youth must be prioritized in ongoing court hearings to decide whether L.A. County’s juvenile halls should be placed into a receivership.

Saying it is “the only option left to ensure the safety and wellbeing of the youth currently in its care,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta filed a request in July to grant full operational control of the county’s juvenile detention facilities to an appointed receiver. He also said the county is “substantially compliant with just 25% of all requirements” in the 2021 settlements.

After several court hearings on the receivership request, L.A. County Superior Court Judge Peter A.

Hernandez has listed education as one of five core reform areas, along with staffing, room confinement, use of force and data management. The next hearing is on Friday.

the و of و is – تفاصيل مهمة

The county’s education department declined an interview to discuss the status of the settlement stipulations.

“Over the past four years, we’ve made substantial progress across multiple areas of the agreement, even while managing significant operational changes, including the closure of Central Juvenile Hall and the opening of Los Padrinos,” Elizabeth Graswich, LACOE’s executive director of public affairs and communication, wrote in a statement to EdSource. “As with many complex, multi-year agreements, some areas required additional time to fully implement.”

Prioritizing education

Full operational control under receivership would include management of its Probation Department, which contracts with the county education department for services to students enrolled in schools within detention facilities. The most recent enrollment data shows 532 students enrolled across seven juvenile detention facilities, with at least 225 in juvenile halls.

It’s this memorandum of understanding between the departments, plus how closely they must work on a regular basis to ensure students receive an education, that makes changes to one department nearly inextricable from the other.

the و of و to – تفاصيل مهمة

Despite this, advocates say education is not always a priority in discussions about reforms to the juvenile justice system.

“It’s kind of a theme that education is a secondary thought … but I think the point is really valid that young people spend a majority of their waking hours in school each day when they’re in a facility, so we should really be focusing on that,” said Megan Stanton-Trehan, a senior attorney with Disability Rights California.

When Stanton-Trehan represented detained students during the initial years of the settlement with LACOE, staff would sometimes say her clients refused special education services, only to later learn her clients weren’t always clear on what the services were.

The settlement requires that the county “document efforts to send youth to the classroom on the same day that the youth refuses to go to school, except when there is an immediate threat to the safety of the youth or others.”

the و to و a – تفاصيل مهمة

But Nuñez agreed that, to this day, it still isn’t always clear whether students actually refused services or how the alleged refusal is documented.

“If I go visit a client and they don’t come out to see me, all I’ll be told is ‘they refused,’” said Nuñez, who was recently told a client didn’t want to meet with her. It was only when she pressed further that she was told the client was in the middle of completing a test.

This story was published on EdSource.

was و a و client – تفاصيل مهمة

Did you use this article in your work?

We’d love to hear how The 74’s reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.Tell us how

how و Did و you – تفاصيل مهمة

Disclaimer: This news article has been republished exactly as it appeared on its original source, without any modification.
We do not take any responsibility for its content, which remains solely the responsibility of the original publisher.

Author:Betty Márquez Rosales
Published on:2025-11-24 21:30:00
Source: www.the74million.org