High Cou Shows Suppo For State Bans On Trans Athletes The 74
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox.Sign up for The 74 Newsletter
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared to support allowing states to decide whether to ban transgender athletes from competing in girls’ and women’s sports — an issue that has dominated the Trump administration’s education policy for the past year.
In two separate cases, attorneys for track athletes from Idaho and West Virginia argued that such restrictions violate trangender students’ constitutional right to equal protection under the law. They say that through medication, these athletes have reduced any sex-based physical advantages that would create unfair competition. The West Virginia case also questions whether the state’s ban violates Title IX’s right to equal educational opportunities for women and girls.
West Virginia’s law treats Becky-Pepper Jackson, a transgender 10th grader, “differently from other girls on the basis of sex,” Joshua Block, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney, told the court. The Bridgeport High School student, he said, took puberty blockers and went through “female puberty.” It’s “absolutely reasonable,” for states to separate teams based on a biological definition of sex, he said, but argued that the states’ position is “invalid as applied to a discrete subset” of people who have mitigated physical advantages.
to و the و that – تفاصيل مهمة
But the conservative justices seemed reluctant to carve out an exception for trans students, even those who have taken steps to reduce any competitive advantage.
“If we adopted that, that would have to apply across the board and not simply to the area of athletics,” Chief Justice John Roberts said.
The court’s decision in the case could impact all 27 states with similar laws that prohibit trans girls from competing on teams consistent with their gender identity.
Upon taking office, President Donald Trump moved aggressively to place restrictions on trans athletes and highlight the experiences of those who said they were either injured by a trans competitor or put at a competitive disadvantage. Through executive order, he said Title IX only applies to cisgender women and girls, while the Department of Justice is now suing California and Maine over allowing trans students to compete on teams consistent with their gender identity.
LGBTQ advocates want the court to base its decision on the 2020 majority opinion inBostock v. Clayton Countyin which the court found that transgender employees are a protected class in the workplace.
“This is unfair to me and every transgender kid who just wants the freedom to be themselves,” Pepper-Jackson said in a recorded message last week. “I’ve had my rights and my life debated by politicians who’ve never even met me.”
Education Secretary Linda McMahon, who attended the than three hours of oral arguments, discussed the stakes for many women outside the court.
the و in و to – تفاصيل مهمة
“Americans have had enough of women and girls losing opportunities and being subjected to the indignity and danger of unfair competition due to the left’s warped application of federal law,” she said.
The department pressured the University of Pennsylvania, for example, to no longer allow trans women to compete on women’s teams. As part of a resolution agreementthe university erased trans swimmer Lia Thomas’ records and issued apologies to swimmers who lost to her.
Attorney Kathleen Hartnett, who represents Boise State University student Lindsay Hecox, who takes drugs to suppress testosterone, told the court that some trans students might even be at a disadvantage. They have “this larger frame with weaker muscles and no testosterone,” she said.
But conservative advocates disagree.
to و the و of – تفاصيل مهمة
“Physiologically, males have a larger heart, lungs, bone mass, muscle mass and are taller than females,” Beth Parlato, senior legal counsel at the conservative Independent Women’s Law Center, told The 74. “It is undisputed that males retain significant physical advantages over females, making sex-based categories essential to fairness and safety in women’s sports.”
‘Treated as individuals’
Inside the court, Hashim Mooppan, principal deputy solicitor general, argued for the Trump administration, saying that denying a “special accommodation” to a trans woman or girl is not discrimination.
But Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, one of the liberal justices, questioned why Hecox didn’t have a claim.
the و a و for – تفاصيل مهمة
“In equal protection law,” she said, “We say all the time things like ‘People need to be treated as individuals and not as just as members of a group.’ ”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, one of the six conservatives on the court, said he “hates” that trans students might be denied an opportunity to participate in sports. He also questioned whether it’s right to “constitutionalize a rule for the whole country” when the science is still evolving.
But making a team or a starting lineup is a “zero-sum game,” he said. “Those things matter to people, big time.”
Observers believe the outcome could rest on how either Roberts or Justice Neal Gorsuch, who wrote theBostockdecision, rule. During Tuesday’s back-and-forth, Gorsuch asked whether transgender status could be considered an “insular class,” considering the history of discrimination against them. But he joined the majority opinion that allowed Tennessee to restrict gender-affirming care for minors.
the و to و a – تفاصيل مهمة
‘Not going to be satisfied’
The court heard the arguments in the same week the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is set to take up another federal case involving trans athletes. Female Athletes Uniteda nonprofit that opposes trans students participating in women’s sports, sued Minnesota officials over the state’s policy allowing athletes to compete on teams based on their gender identity.
“Their argument is that Title IX demands exclusion of trans athletes from girls’ teams, which is not going to be our position,” said Brian Dittmeier, director of LGBTQI+ Equality at the National Women’s Law Center, which filed a brief in support of Minnesota.
The decision in the Eighth Circuit case, he said, is likely to come before the Supreme Court rules in the Idaho and West Virginia lawsuits, and could “inform the narrative” in future cases. The Female Athletes United lawsuit, he said, shows that those opposed to allowing trans athletes to compete with women are “not going to be satisfied with a compromise of letting the states decide.”
Did you use this article in your work?
the و to و in – تفاصيل مهمة
We’d love to hear how The 74’s reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers.Tell us how
Disclaimer: This news article has been republished exactly as it appeared on its original source, without any modification. We do not take any responsibility for its content, which remains solely the responsibility of the original publisher.
Author:Linda Jacobson
Published on:2026-01-14 01:42:00
Source: www.the74million.org
!function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n; n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;n.queue=();t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)(0);s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,’script’,’https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js’); fbq(‘init’, ‘626037510879173’); // 626037510879173 fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);{“@context”:”http:\/\/schema.org”,”@type”:”NewsArticle”,”dateCreated”:”2026-01-14T10:45:12+04:00″,”datePublished”:”2026-01-14T10:45:12+04:00″,”dateModified”:”2026-01-14T10:45:12+04:00″,”headline”:”High Court Shows Support for State Bans on Trans Athletes The 74″,”name”:”High Court Shows Support for State Bans on Trans Athletes The 74″,”keywords”:[],”url”:”https:\/\/uaetodaynews.com\/high-court-shows-support-for-state-bans-on-trans-athletes-the-74\/”,”description”:”Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared to support allowing states to decide whether to ban transgender athlete”,”copyrightYear”:”2026″,”articleSection”:”Education”,”articleBody”:”\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\n \n Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter\n \n \n \n \nThe U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared to support allowing states to decide whether to ban transgender athletes from competing in girls\u2019 and women\u2019s sports \u2014 an issue that has dominated the Trump administration\u2019s education policy for the past year.\n\n\n\nIn two separate cases, attorneys for track athletes from Idaho and West Virginia argued that such restrictions violate trangender students\u2019 constitutional right to equal protection under the law. They say that through medication, these athletes have reduced any sex-based physical advantages that would create unfair competition. The West Virginia case also questions whether the state\u2019s ban violates Title IX\u2019s right to equal educational opportunities for women and girls.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWest Virginia\u2019s law treats Becky-Pepper Jackson, a transgender 10th grader, \u201cdifferently from other girls on the basis of sex,\u201d Joshua Block, an American Civil Liberties Union attorney, told the court. The Bridgeport High School student, he said, took puberty blockers and went through \u201cfemale puberty.\u201d It\u2019s \u201cabsolutely reasonable,\u201d for states to separate teams based on a biological definition of sex, he said, but argued that the states\u2019 position is \u201cinvalid as applied to a discrete subset\u201d of people who have mitigated physical advantages.\n\n\n\nBecky Pepper-Jackson attends the Lambda Legal Liberty Awards on June 08, 2023 in New York City. (Roy Rochlin\/Getty Images for Lambda Legal )\n\n\n\nBut the conservative justices seemed reluctant to carve out an exception for trans students, even those who have taken steps to reduce any competitive advantage. \n\n\n\n\u201cIf we adopted that, that would have to apply across the board and not simply to the area of athletics,\u201d Chief Justice John Roberts said.\n\n\n\nThe court\u2019s decision in the case could impact all 27 states with similar laws that prohibit trans girls from competing on teams consistent with their gender identity. \n\n\n\nRelatedSupreme Court to Address Legality of Barring Trans Athletes From School Sports\n\n\n\nUpon taking office, President Donald Trump moved aggressively to place restrictions on trans athletes and highlight the experiences of those who said they were either injured by a trans competitor or put at a competitive disadvantage. Through executive order, he said Title IX only applies to cisgender women and girls, while the Department of Justice is now suing California and Maine over allowing trans students to compete on teams consistent with their gender identity. LGBTQ advocates want the court to base its decision on the 2020 majority opinion in Bostock v. Clayton County in which the court found that transgender employees are a protected class in the workplace. \n\n\n\n\u201cThis is unfair to me and every transgender kid who just wants the freedom to be themselves,\u201d Pepper-Jackson said in a recorded message last week. \u201cI\u2019ve had my rights and my life debated by politicians who\u2019ve never even met me.\u201d\n\n\n\nEducation Secretary Linda McMahon, who attended the more than three hours of oral arguments, discussed the stakes for many women outside the court. \n\n\n\n\u201cAmericans have had enough of women and girls losing opportunities and being subjected to the indignity and danger of unfair competition due to the left\u2019s warped application of federal law,\u201d she said.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nEducation Secretary Linda McMahon spoke in favor of the states\u2019 cases Tuesday outside the U.S. Supreme Court. (Oliver Contreras\/AFP via Getty Images)\n\n\n\nThe department pressured the University of Pennsylvania, for example, to no longer allow trans women to compete on women\u2019s teams. As part of a resolution agreementthe university erased trans swimmer Lia Thomas\u2019 records and issued apologies to swimmers who lost to her. \n\n\n\nAttorney Kathleen Hartnett, who represents Boise State University student Lindsay Hecox, who takes drugs to suppress testosterone, told the court that some trans students might even be at a disadvantage.\u00a0 They have \u201cthis larger frame with weaker muscles and no testosterone,\u201d she said.\n\n\n\nBut conservative advocates disagree. \n\n\n\n\u201cPhysiologically, males have a larger heart, lungs, more bone mass, more muscle mass and are taller than females,\u201d Beth Parlato, senior legal counsel at the conservative Independent Women\u2019s Law Center, told The 74. \u201cIt is undisputed that males retain significant physical advantages over females, making sex-based categories essential to fairness and safety in women\u2019s sports.\u201d\n\n\n\nRelated\u2018There Are Risks Both Ways\u2019: Supreme Court Weighs Medical Care for Trans Youth\n\n\n\n\u2018Treated as individuals\u2019\n\n\n\nInside the court, Hashim Mooppan, principal deputy solicitor general, argued for the Trump administration, saying that denying a \u201cspecial accommodation\u201d to a trans woman or girl is not discrimination.\n\n\n\nBut Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, one of the liberal justices, questioned why Hecox didn\u2019t have a claim. \n\n\n\n\u201cIn equal protection law,\u201d she said, \u201cWe say all the time things like \u2018People need to be treated as individuals and not as just as members of a group.\u2019 \u201d\n\n\n\nJustice Brett Kavanaugh, one of the six conservatives on the court, said he \u201chates\u201d that trans students might be denied an opportunity to participate in sports. He also questioned whether it\u2019s right to \u201cconstitutionalize a rule for the whole country\u201d when the science is still evolving. But making a team or a starting lineup is a \u201czero-sum game,\u201d he said. \u201cThose things matter to people, big time.\u201d\n\n\n\nObservers believe the outcome could rest on how either Roberts or Justice Neal Gorsuch, who wrote the Bostock decision, rule. During Tuesday\u2019s back-and-forth, Gorsuch asked whether transgender status could be considered an \u201cinsular class,\u201d considering the history of discrimination against them. But he joined the majority opinion that allowed Tennessee to restrict gender-affirming care for minors. \n\n\n\n\u2018Not going to be satisfied\u2019\n\n\n\nThe court heard the arguments in the same week the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is set to take up another federal case involving trans athletes. Female Athletes Uniteda nonprofit that opposes trans students participating in women\u2019s sports, sued Minnesota officials over the state\u2019s policy allowing athletes to compete on teams based on their gender identity.\n\n\n\n\u201cTheir argument is that Title IX demands exclusion of trans athletes from girls\u2019 teams, which is not going to be our position,\u201d said Brian Dittmeier, director of LGBTQI+ Equality at the National Women\u2019s Law Center, which filed a brief in support of Minnesota. \n\n\n\nThe decision in the Eighth Circuit case, he said, is likely to come before the Supreme Court rules in the Idaho and West Virginia lawsuits, and could \u201cinform the narrative\u201d in future cases. The Female Athletes United lawsuit, he said, shows that those opposed to allowing trans athletes to compete with women are \u201cnot going to be satisfied with a compromise of letting the states decide.\u201d \n\n \n \n \n Did you use this article in your work?
\nWe\u2019d love to hear how The 74\u2019s reporting is helping educators, researchers, and policymakers. Tell us how\n \n \n !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s){if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod?\n n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)};if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;\n n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version=’2.0′;n.queue=();t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0;\n t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)(0);s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window,\n document,’script’,’https:\/\/connect.facebook.net\/en_US\/fbevents.js’);\n fbq(‘init’, ‘626037510879173’); \/\/ 626037510879173\n fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’);\n \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nDisclaimer: This news article has been republished exactly as it appeared on its original source, without any modification. \r\nWe do not take any responsibility for its content, which remains solely the responsibility of the original publisher.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nAuthor: Linda Jacobson\r\nPublished on: 2026-01-14 01:42:00\r\nSource: www.the74million.org\r\n\r\n”,”publisher”:{“@id”:”#Publisher”,”@type”:”Organization”,”name”:”uaetodaynews”,”logo”:{“@type”:”ImageObject”,”url”:”https:\/\/uaetodaynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/images-e1759081190269.png”},”sameAs”:[“https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/uaetodaynewscom”,”https:\/\/www.pinterest.com\/uaetodaynews\/”,”https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/uaetoday_news_com\/”]},”sourceOrganization”:{“@id”:”#Publisher”},”copyrightHolder”:{“@id”:”#Publisher”},”mainEntityOfPage”:{“@type”:”WebPage”,”@id”:”https:\/\/uaetodaynews.com\/high-court-shows-support-for-state-bans-on-trans-athletes-the-74\/”,”breadcrumb”:{“@id”:”#Breadcrumb”}},”author”:{“@type”:”Person”,”name”:”uaetodaynews”,”url”:”https:\/\/uaetodaynews.com\/author\/arabsongmedia-net\/”},”image”:{“@type”:”ImageObject”,”url”:”https:\/\/uaetodaynews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/01\/trans-sports-supreme-court-825×495.jpg”,”width”:1200,”height”:495}}
Disclaimer: This news article has been republished exactly as it appeared on its original source, without any modification.
We do not take any responsibility for its content, which remains solely the responsibility of the original publisher.
Author: uaetodaynews
Published on: 2026-01-14 06:45:00
Source: uaetodaynews.com
